Archive for December, 2010

Last Morning of 2010

Posted in A Few Old, Short Words, Crash! Art with tags , , , on December 31, 2010 by Crash! Landen

I started this blog on May 29, 2009. It was originally set up to just post some of my drawings. I have since randomly posted art, movie reviews, my Lists (By Year) of the Best and Worst films of the last 3 decades and my college football picks. I haven’t tried to stick to a schedule or a particular subject.  I have managed to post on 325 different days, though; sometimes with multiple entries. I’ve also gotten about 350,000 hits which has been surprising. It doesn’t mean anything, but I am surprised.

It was pointed out to me on a couple of occasions yesterday that I haven’t posted art in a while. I’ll rectify that in 2011 if I can. I haven’t been as diligent as I could be. I’ll be attempting to change that in the coming year. I don’t usually do New Year’s Resolutions, but I’m going to this year. The next 325 days of  posts will feature a substantially higher percentage of art if I have my way. It’s not GREAT art, but it is mine and that will be a goal; to concentrate on art.

Crash! Landen’s Best 10 Movies of 2010 (Updated 7/31/11)

Posted in Lists with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on December 30, 2010 by Crash! Landen

Well, here we are at the end of 2010 and so here is my list of the 10 Best Films. As I said in my Worst 10, I only managed 45 or so ‘new’ films this year. There are a number that I wanted to see and didn’t (like ‘Monsters’) and several that I know would probably be good, but I passed on them for one reason or another (like The Social Network which I HAVE now seen). Of the 10 I did choose, there are some that were released in 2010. Because they are foreign films they debuted in the good ol’ USA in 2010. Hence, they’re on the List.

I wrestled with the order. My #1 started out at #4 and ended up on top. Tron went up and down also (Bumped now). The list reflects my appreciation for the technical aspects of film as well as the storytelling. All of them on the list are worth seeing, in any case.

Some films that I liked, but didn’t quite make my list: OndineThe American… The documentary  I Am Comic… Scott Pilgrim vs The WorldEdge Of Darkness…  Shutter Island… even Robin Hood. I may be the only one that liked one or two of these. Anyway, here’s my 10.


Tron (Bumped…. I think the visuals outweighed the weaknesses of the story, though. And I guess the name is Tron:Legacy. Sorry.)

The Social Network (Updated… Err… Didn’t quite make my Top 10 anyway… I did think it was better than Tron, though. Just missed my Top 10. Fincher did a heckuva’ job given the boring subject matter and personalities involved.)

 The Karate Kid (2010)(Bumped, but a great remake/reinvention. This actually surprised me a great deal and it may deserve to be higher. It’s entertaining and the shots of the Chinese landscape are beautiful.)

The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (Bumped! Has some gratuity, but  a good suspense flick. Just be prepared to watch some really tough subject matter to get through.)

10 The Ghost Writer (Not Polanski’s best, but he was editing the thing in prison. The movie is #7 on my list, though, not Polanski’s character.)

9 Black Swan (Yes, a ballet movie. It’s surreal as Aranofsky often is. Not his best, but still pretty good.)

8 127 Hours (I finally braved watching this. I had heard so much about how horrible that particular moment of the film… you know which one I speak of… that I’ve been avoiding it. After seeing the moment in question, I have to say it was not nearly as terrible as everyone had made it out to be. I’ve seen far worse. And the stomach turning moment in the film turned out to be earlier in the film, at least for me. But that’s all beside the point. It IS a great movie. It did keep me emotionally involved even though i knew what was coming. Danny Boyle wins again.

7 How To Train Your Dragon (Way better than I was expecting and devoid of pop culture references which should be applauded.)

6 The Town (Another great film by Affleck. He’s a better director than actor.)

5 Toy Story 3 (Mark Kermode calls this the best trilogy ever made. I don’t know if I agree, but this WAS a great third installment following the continuing adventures of Woody and crew.)

4 Inception (A movie of ideas and dreams. The only reason I placed this at #2, was because,  like Christopher Nolan’s other films, there were a few parts in this that seemed bloated and in need of some editing. Still, it was an amazing film and my one and two could easily be swapped.)

True Grit [The more I thought about this film, the more I see how carefully crafted it was. Right from the opening quotation; no even before the movie starts (if you read the poster). The film works toward a singular point. Jeff Bridges gives an even better performance than in last year's Crazy Heart. The film's protagonist played by Haillee Steinfeld also is deserving of possible acting awards as well as Barry Pepper in a brief supporting role. This movie has everything that you could want in an entertainment. Action, humor, intelligence, drama, subtext and a point to the story. The Coens win, again.]

2 The Way Back (An EPIC Peter Weir film. Politics played a large part in the number of lukewarm reviews that it received. Ed Harris is brilliant in this in a supporting role. I know. I know. He’s brilliant tin everything, but he really is here. The more I reassess how the film is structured and the nature of each character, the better it becomes in my eyes. Great, great film.)

1 The King’s Speech (My new #1. One of those rare films where there’s nothing to complain about. The best film of 2010 with what has to be the best performance of the year by Firth and the best supporting role by Rush. A GREAT movie.)

Looking forward to 2011. Hopefully it’ll be a good year.

Crash! Landen’s Worst 10 Movies of 2010 (Updated 7/27/11)

Posted in Lists with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on December 29, 2010 by Crash! Landen

I didn’t see many 2010 films (Um… well, that was true at the time I first typed this). About 60 or so I think. The stipulations for getting on my list: First, I have to have seen the film. That’s… obvious, right? Second, the film has to suck to some substantial degree. That may not be entirely true with all of these. I gave two and a halves on Devil and The Last AirBender, I think. I have seen several REALLY awful films since I first made the list, though, so those two (and others) have fallen out of the Top (or Bottom) 10.  I also thought The White Ribbon was put together professionally (as was The Girl Who Kicked The Hornet’s Nest). It just had too many warts. Greenberg probably deserved to be on this list, but I had to pick 10 and these are the 10 I went with. I left the ones that were formally on the list. If you want to know WHY I put them on the list, just click on the names and they’ll take you to my reviews.

(Bumped) Devil (M. Night avoids the double dip on my list.)

(Bumped) The Last Airbender (And Bumped. M. Night skates away….)

(Bumped) The Lovely Bones

(Bumped) Frozen

(Bumped) The Girl Who Kicked The Hornet’s Nest (A real downer that this was the weakest of the trilogy.)

 The White Ribbon (BUMPED… At least this had some artistic merit in its ambiguity. Winter’s Bone, however….)

10 The Losers

9 The Wolfman

8 Kick Ass

7 Skyline6 Splice

 

5 Buried4 The Killer Inside Me

Winter’s Bone (And this sucker actually won awards. Take my word for it and stay as far away as you can.)

2 Alice In Wonderland

1 Clash Of The Titans

Wow, it looks like the summer blockbuster line-up doesn’t it? I really, REALLY wanted to like #1, but it did just about everything it could do to make me hate it, including insulting Ray Harryhausen during the film.

But there’s my 10. Not as awful as many past years, but nauseating enough… And if I was forced to watch the films in but one of my worst lists, 2010 might not be such a bad year to pick.

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2010/2009) Short Review

Posted in Reviews with tags , , , , , , , on December 28, 2010 by Crash! Landen

The Swedish film ‘The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo’ has a number of shockingly gratuitous scenes, but if you get past that it’s a film definitely worth watching being a pretty good suspense flick. It’s based on the bestselling book (one in a series) by Stieg Larrson who passed in 2004.

The cinematography is decent. It doesn’t have quite the production values of your average Hollywood film, but it’s still possesses interesting visuals. It’s a fairly well written story. As I said, there is a scene or two that probably belonged in the sequel.

Here they could have been edited as they’re repetitive in showing how the world seems to antagonize the main character without provocation.

Noomi Rapace plays Lisbeth, the emo-punk computer hacker that is at the center of the story. She’s believable as the angry protagonist.

Michael Niqvest is a great compliment to her. I can’t speak the language, but I buy him as journalist Michael Blomkvist from the foreign press. Everything in the film isn’t completely logical (or even believable), but it works for the most part.

The main drawback to the film is the running time.  the movie goes a little too long with the multiple endings, epilogues and codas(no, wait.. There’s more… and more…) Other than that it’s a decent suspense flick and worth a look.

I don’t quite understand why these foreign films like this and Let The Right One In are getting remade so quickly over here. In LTROI’s case, Let Me In was unnecessary and almost exactly the same. But maybe David Fincher will do something decent with it. We’ll see.

4 of 5

Kick Ass (2010) Short Review

Posted in Reviews with tags , , , on December 28, 2010 by Crash! Landen

I read the comics version of Kick Ass and didn’t care for it, despite being a fan of Romita Jr. So I didn’t see it at the theater.

SPOILERS: I hoped they had made improvements to the source material, but the story is still cliched and juvenile. That it was so unrealistic would be fine, but it was advertised as ‘what if someone tried to be a superhero in the real world’? There WERE some changes made that netted mixed results.

The Red Mist character’s tie to Mark Strong’s villain was given away immediately, so it took away any suspense when he betrays KickAss. At least the comics had that going for them, even if it was predictable. That they didn’t have Cage cop to being an accountant in the film was an improvement . That never made any sense in the source material.

There were times the filmmakers were assuming that the entire audience had read the comics; sometimes not giving explanations for what occurred onscreen. I also didn’t like the KickAss character. He comes off as a jerk especially in the introduction. His motivation to become KickAss as arbitrary is fine had they given more significance to his obsession with superheroes. As it is, he’s shown as a typical comic book store nerd. ALL comicnerds talk about if comic superheroes existed in the real world, but they don’t become costumed vigilantes. There needed to be more on why this one was so obsessed that he thinks it would be a good idea to be one.

And he never lives up to his name. Hitgirl was the only one doing that. The writer clearly was more interested in the 10 year old. Why the producers thought a large audience would care to see a foul mouthed 10 year old unrealistically killing adults in CGI action scenes with silly music in the background is laughable. That they marketed that aspect as the reason to see this speaks of their incompetence. Hopefully the producers find better material in the future so there won’t be a sequel inflicted on the world. Not with so many better comics properties.

1.5 of 5

The Losers (2010) Short Review

Posted in Reviews with tags , , , , , on December 28, 2010 by Crash! Landen

I wasn’t in the target audience for this film. I like good movies. There are so many cliches borrowed from elsewhere that it gets kind of pathetic.

The CGI is spotty throughout and just horrible and cheap looking in some instances. This is also one of those movies that I can’t stand where a highly trained guy (the team leader of the Losers) that’s probably over 230 pounds is actually getting his @$$ handed to him by a 120 pound girl. The fact that he would even throw the first punch at her is stupid in itself. Apparently, it’s now chauvinistic to NOT hit a girl.

The way the fight occurs is she introduces herself as someone who wants to offer a business proposition, cocks a gun’s hammer behind her back and then they fight in slo mo for 2 minutes where she mostly gets the better of him. That he cares for children, but would beat up a woman is lame, but that he would get his @$$ kicked by her…. And if I was that 2nd or 3rd security guard, Chris Evans would have been shot. That might’ve helped the movie, too and I like Chris Evans. There were just too many ridiculous scenes. The ‘escape while handcuffed’ scene being the most braindead.

The writer (and characters) spend a lot of time trying to convince the audience how cool they are: line after silly line of flat attempts at humor, along with posturing and posing. There’s no tension in the entire film. Nothing’s ever in doubt and it unfolds exactly how you know it will.

The characters themselves are cartoonish, Jason Patric’s character being the prime example. I wish they had done less posturing and casting neutered threats at one another. Speaking of neutered there’s even a sex scene without sex. I guess they felt that they needed to titillate the youngsters, but remain PG-13 to sell more tickets (I guess).

Even the action scenes weren’t that well done. The story defies logic and is all over the board in tone trying to be grimly serious one moment and lighthearted the next.. The one positive thing I will say is it does have a decent look to it. Too bad the writing and direction was so amateurish. Very disappointing.

2 of 5

The White Ribbon (2010) Short Review

Posted in Reviews with tags , , on December 28, 2010 by Crash! Landen

You may notice the ’4 star’ blurbs on the poster, one stating ‘ immense subtlety’, but I think they must have confused subtlety with meandering. I gave it a far lower rating. Don’t take my word for it, though. See it and let me know what you think.

The White Ribbon is a film that begins with a narrator telling you this is a story that may explain the reason for a war happening and then proceeds to be as ambiguous as possible. There is nothing in the film to extrapolate with logic what the filmmaker was trying to say. The film’s loaded with dangling storylines, red herrings, contradictions, misleading information, and lots and lots and LOTS of plotlines that are never tied together in any meaningful way. Then it ends by not standing by the opening statement and giving the viewer something to help put the film in context.

The only person in the film that doesn’t appear to have major problems is the narrator: the schoolteacher who is impotent at everything that he attempts onscreen and is the only one to offer up a solution but is intimidated by the town constable into keeping his mouth shut (he believes the children have something to do with all of the problems, but it’s never proven as to what and how they’re involved).

This is really just another attack on religion by a filmmaker, laying the blame without also regarding the positives. If that’s the case I would strongly disagree with that. A bigger problem is the story never even presents that with any clarity. It’s just a collection of random happenings.And if the filmmaker really wanted to know the reasons for WWII, he might try opening up a history book.

As I’ve said in other reviews, you can place all of the symbols you like in a film, but if they aren’t properly tied together in some coherent way, then those symbols have no meaning. Maybe that’s what the director was going for, to be pointless. That seems to be what’s considered art nouveau these days. The film’s cousin may be The Last Picture Show, another bleak B&W film that purports to depict a loss of innocence when innocence is never established.

Because of the ambiguity of the story, this is obviously a very polarizing film. By leaving the vessel ultimately empty, he allows the viewer to fill it up with their own ideas and values. I’ve read the synopsis, other reviews and even words from the film’s director, but for me, none of the things discussed are actually in the context of the film and the film never adds up to anything other than a monumental waste of time.

2 of 5 (whatevers)

Alice In Wonderland (2010) Short Review

Posted in Reviews with tags , , on December 27, 2010 by Crash! Landen

Let me state up front that I havent been a fan of Tim Burton’s work for quite some time. While his films are somewhat imaginative visually (and I want to stress the word somewhat) I find his films have a soulless quality to them. I didn’t think this one was any different.

To start with the sets and character designs, it looks like they filmed everything in bright bold colors, but Burton was unhappy with that and had all of the colors muted. That, combined with the character designs, made for a very boring look. I can’t call the characters like the Red Queen (with her big noggin) grotesque, because at least that would be somewhat interesting. They’re just boringly weird. The sets and costumes are elaborate but that doesn’t help the story that is completely devoid of any suspense. From the moment Alice is told to be at a certain location to meet a certain obnoxious suitor who is going to ask her to marry him you know how the movie will go. Worried that some might not, Burton’s Alice constantly reminds you that she is in control of her dream. Hint. Hint. And if you then don’t know where it’s going then you’re probably who he’s aiming for.

It REALLY got tedious about an hour in and especially so once Alice dons armor and a sword, casually talking to herself during a very poorly choeographed battle on probably the most bland battleground that the CGI animators could come up with: a flat plain with virtually nothing in the background. Maybe they ran out of cash when they went to 3D, I dont know, but they should have spent the money on a better writer (and a better director).

1 of 5

Black Swan Review (2010)

Posted in Reviews with tags , , , , , , , on December 26, 2010 by Crash! Landen

While not perfect, Darren Arronofsky’s Black Swan is a tale of someone who loses their soul in  a pursuit of supreme vanity in the guise of art or craft.

It’s sometimes hard to tell the difference in reality and  the phantoms that persecute the protaganist of the film played by Natalie Portman (the protagonist, not the film… she’s not playing the film).

Portman is a young ballet dancer named Nina, who is the most polished  of her troupe, but is told by her director that she lacks in emotion and the ability to ‘let go’ to perform with more emotion.

The ballet troupe’s director, Thomas, played by Frenchman Vincent Cassel takes a VERY ‘hands on’ approach, having been the lover of the ballet’s former prima ballerina and now he’s searching for a replacement (professionally and romantically).

The top dancers all vie for the role of the Swan Queen, but Nina’s top competition comes mainly from a new girl named Lily (played by Mila Kunis) who resembles Nina while being much more free spirited. The role Nina covets, consists of performing a dual role/dance; the White Swan and  the Black Swan.

Thomas believes that Nina is only suited for the White Swan. There is also subtle pressure applied to Nina in the form of her mother, whom she still lives with.

There are aspects of the story that are subtle, especially the relationship between mother and daughter, but much of the story is theatrically fantastic spectacle, especially the relationships with her director or with Lily, which are much more overt. Things that are inherent in a film about a dance troupe are present such as the catty competition and the daily training, but this much more than a film about ballet. The central story could take place in just about any setting, even those that aren’t artistic in nature.

There is much that’s symbolic in the film, at times being practically spelled out for the audience. Obviously, black and white in literature have always represented the pure and the impure, order and chaos, good and evil.

Nina wears white and the corrupting influences ranging from her mother, Thomas, the former prima ballerina (Winona Ryder in a small part) who loathes her would be replacement, Nina and other competitors, all wear black.  Arronofsky seems to be fairly direct when he has a character change their wardrobe’s color scheme.

Mirrors often represent opportunities to denote self reflection, as well as epitomize vanity. Here it does both.

The mirrors become almost a character unto themselves. Keep that in mind in the film’s finale.

Arronofsky does create many details to bolster what the film’s building towards. I kept wondering why Arronofsky had the camera trailing Portman’s character so closely, to where her head took up much of the frame. As with the mirrors, Portman’s hairstyle takes on significance.

Much of what occurs in the film is figurative. I think one of the first scenes introducing Nina gives an indication of what will follow. Nina appears to be speaking with someone who’s not there. It’s obvious what the story is aiming for, but it’s interesting at how it gets there.

There was much hype focused on the sexual content involving Portman and Kunis. A lot of it is purely of the ‘titilating’ variety. I’m not complaining, but it is worth seeing for more than just that reason.

It’s a pretty good film. Not Arranofsky’s best film (far from it), but it’s still more interesting than most of the other film’s out there.

It’s visually entertaining, surreal and full of dark imagery. There also a few creepy moments that have a bit of shock value.


There’s a steady descent and the shocks are foreshadowed by smaller moments involving fingers, toenails and loose skin, then moving on to what looked like plucked chicken skin.

But, being forced to watch Natalie Portman (among others) in any film isn’t exactly what I would call torture.

And speaking of the lovely and very talented Portman, I must say she was perfect in this role. Although she is a bit  more short-limbed than the way I would picture a typical ballerina, but after 10 months of dance training she was very believable.

There were several instances when I thought they were using a body double until the camera panned up and confirmed that it was Portman. Of course, nowadays, there could have been some digital manipulation going on.


Nina experiences a wide range of emotions in the story and Portman does a fine job of portraying that. She also was very good with the subtle changes that the character experiences throughout. I do think like her character, though, she looks like she’s trying to overcompensate for her vanilla nature in the role of the Black Swan. Ironic?

Anyway, he did a good job, as did Kunis. the role that might not get as much recognition is that of Nina’s mother. Barbara Hershey plays her with enough nuance that initially, the viewer won’t get a hint of  exactly what kind of  influence she has on her daughter.

It’s apparent early on that she’s one of those parents that failed in their dream and are now living through their offspring possibly detrimental to them both. Hershey could have been a lot more over the top but remained low key that benefitted the story.

As I said Black Swan is a pretty good film. It won’t make my top five of the year, but  is still a film worth seeing. The beautiful women that are in it and Aranoffsky’s usual unorthodox screenplay and direction , make it worthwhile even if you care nothing for ballet.

If you’re a fan of any of the main players or the director, you’ll probably be happy with it. On the other hand if you don’t like anything too ‘artsy’, this might cause some sort of hemorrhage. Arranofsky’s not for everyone.

All of his films from Pi to this one aren’t really aimed at the mainstream, but they have managed to find an audience (like The Wrestler). His movies aren’t prepackaged for consumption and I kind of like that. 4 of 5 (whatevers)



Merry Christmas!

Posted in A Few Old, Short Words with tags , on December 26, 2010 by Crash! Landen

Just forgot to say it on my blog….

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers