Archive for February, 2010

The Crazies Long Review With MAJOR Spoilers (2.5 of 5)

Posted in Reviews with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 27, 2010 by Crash! Landen

WARNING: MAJOR SPOILERS IN THIS ONE. I COVER THE ENTIRE STORY IN DETAIL. IF YOU READ FURTHER, DON”T BLAME ME FOR SPOILING THE MOVIE FOR YOU. AND IT’S NOT MY FAULT IF YOU CAN’T HELP YOURSELF EVEN AFTER I’VE WARNED YOU, SO DON’T BLAME ME FOR THAT, EITHER.

Let me make this clear. I didn’t hate this movie. It has good things going for it, but I was mildly aggravated by the many gaping holes in the plot and  just a general lack of real world logic imbued within. If you check your brain at the theater door, you’ll probably have a reasonably good time watching a mostly disposable movie. My problem is, I had heard that this was a very well made film and better than your average B-Movie flick of this genre. My main problem was that I didn’t lower expectations and check my brain at the door.

I guess I set myself up for disappointment with ‘The Crazies’. It had a great trailer. So great in fact that it was scarier than the movie. The trailer also gave away several key moments in the film (including the ending) and successfully made this movie look like it was going to be much more brutal than it was. Do I want brutal? No, I just want a good movie.

Second, it’s directed by Breck Eisner. He hasn’t directed many movies; the only one of his that I was previously exposed to was Sahara. I liked Sahara despite it being very flawed. It was big dumb mainstream entertainment with actors that did that really well (that’s really not a shot at them. Really). I had high hopes that Eisner would make something as least as good as that one.

Third, it starred Timothy Olyphant, who I like as an actor. He does a good job here as David Dutton, a small town sheriff dealing with a bizarre crisis. Olyphant seems to be able to elevate even the worst script material. He helped make this movie tolerable for me. He wasn’t the problem.

Fourth, it also stars Radha Mitchell, who I looooove as an actress (see also my Review of Surrogates). She plays Judy Dutton, the sheriff’s doctor wife. Both of them know something strange is going on. She definitely was not the problem.

Fifth, it had some other decent folks in it… It took me a while to figure out who the sheriff’s deputy Russell was: Joe Anderson who I last saw in the Beatles inspired movie ‘Across The Universe’. He had to win me over in that one (just as that whole movie did). He did a pretty good job here as the (somewhat country) sidekick lawman in The Crazies. He made the most of this part and the director allowed him to show off a bit of emotional range and some subtlety. He did a good job.

Crazy enough, Danielle doesn't dress like this in The Crazies...

I also liked Judy’s cute assistant Danielle Panabaker, but knew as soon as she popped up that she was going to be an eventual member of the movie’s body count total and I wasn’t let down. She did a reasonably good job in a small role that really only required her to play  nice, scared or impetuously teenage. I would even go so far as to say she was not important to the plot, either, since everything that she is involved with in the movie is repeated or had already been seen, but I guess I’m getting ahead of myself. And she and Joe Anderson weren’t the problems, either.

Sixth (or seventh, I don’t know.. I can’t count days, either), it has that big screen look that all of these big horror movie remakes seemed to now have. The trouble with that is that despite the fact that they know how to shoot great looking shots, sometimes they still don’t know what to shoot or seem to know why they’re shooting it in the way that they’re shooting it. But,that’s just the beginning of my problems with the movie.

As I’m sure you already know, the movie is a remake of the 1973 George Romero horror movie of the same name. I don’t know how closely it follows the original, since I had never even heard of the ‘classic’, until well after I knew about this movie, and I go out of my way to find good horror movies, no matter how old they are. My biggest problem with the movie are the overall story flaws that I feel fall at the feet of the screenwriters Scott Kosar and Ray Wright (who both have been attached to movies that were mediocre at best) and the director.

The town of Ogden Marsh.

The movie starts out well enough. In the opening moments, the audience is treated to the quick image of a burning town (Ogden Marsh) before they bounce back 2 days to show you the explanation. I must say I’ve seen that explanation and everything else that happens in The Crazies in other films,especially zombie/virus flicks. Perhaps, the original movie did all of this first, I don’t know, but if it did then this was an unnecessary remake, anyway. Technically, this is NOT a zombie flick, unless you mean that it’s a zombie flick in the way that 28 Days Later is a zombie flick. It’s more of a pandemic movie where the victims of a virus become semi-mindless killers. They’re not actually dead. Details…

Anyway, after the film-makers show a montage of ‘small town life’ shots to establish “Hey! Ogden Marsh is just a normal American small town, here”, they quickly get to the weird goings-on. The first ‘incident’ is at a (high school?) baseball game, David and his deputy have to deal with a man that walks onto the field holding a loaded shotgun. David knows the man (a former town drunk) and tries to avoid a violent outcome, but ends up having to kill him. There is a quick funeral where in the first of 2 ‘Jaws’ moments in the film, it is revealed that the town drunk was NOT drunk and his family now blame  the sheriff for his death. This seemed very contrived considering the fact that the man did walk out onto a (high school) baseball game in progress in broad daylight with a shotgun and pointed it at the sheriff’s head after he had repeatedly asked him to put the gun down, in front of (practically) the entire population of this town. You would think the wife and son would want to understand why the man was out there with a gun in the first place. And I’m only picking a nit here….

Okay, remember that this had to happen within the 2 days. The man’s wife and son confront the sheriff at some kind of service for the  shooting. I would think that would take place several hours later, if not days. Also, there is a toxicology test performed that comes back just a couple of hours later, while the sheriff is back at the office. From what I know about real world toxicology tests, they take a little bit longer than that. In the recent death of actress Britney Murphy, there was such a test done and the results didn’t come out for several weeks if I’m remembering correctly… Again picking nits…

Elsewhere, the sheriff’s doctor-wife is seeing a patient with the same sort of  spaced out symptoms that the man on the baseball field was having. After being taken home by his family, the same man becomes one of those wraithlike figures in horror movies that can teleport around without being seen, until they jump into view or the camera pans over to show that they had been standing in the background all along. Spooky… Anyway, the man cranks up some farm equipment in the barn (which is on the trailer) and the wife comes out to investigate. At this point, I actually thought there was going to be some ‘hamburger’ made to please the gorehounds, but apparently Eisner doesn’t have the stomach for that sort of thing. Sure there’s violence and a bit of gore in the film… a bit… but this definitely wasn’t a movie that was going to rely on the current trend of horror movie torture porn or prolonged sadistic acts.

Let me just say, I am very happy about that. I love a good splatter as much as the next horror fan; it’s just when a movie deteriorates into focusing in on the acts of suffering unnecessarily (and pointlessly) instead of moving the story along when it begins to annoy me. The only torture-porn that I’ve seen that had any merit to it was Eden Lake, but even in that the T-P was still prolonged unnecessarily and would have made the same point without it, but I digress. Again, I applaud that aspect of The Crazies. but the bad thing about that, was that from that point on, I kind of knew that the director was never going to ‘go there’.

I think something that a lot of film-makers don’t understand is that you don’t have to keep going to the well if you establish that you’ll go all out early on. The most famous example was in Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho, where after establishing who the audience thinks is the heroine, in pops Norman Bates in the shower scene to ‘off’ her in shocking fashion (albeit mostly bloodless). It’s the most brutal scene in the movie and the ‘carry over’ was that from then on all bets were off in the minds of the  viewers. Another of my favorites, David Fincher’s Zodiac establishes the brutality of the killer very early in the movie. One scene was downright disturbing to me in its realism. But there never is anything else that is as remotely as violent in the last two thirds of the movie. There didn’t have to be; you’re expecting it… I guess, that’s the suspense aspect as opposed to shock for shock’s sake, but I’m digressing wildly.

Where was I? Okay, the man doesn’t use the farm equipment on his wife. However, he does lock her and their son in a closet and burn the house down with them still inside. These killings are sanitized by a quick scream when the fire is set and cutting to the next scene.

The next morning, firemen are waiting for the sheriff when he arrives with his wife and are told that the man had set fire to the house, killed his family and proceeded to mow the lawn even when after they had arrived.  For me, the whole scene involving the farm equipment and the arson are COMPLETELY unnecessary to the film, other than add to the onscreen body count. If they had stayed with the sheriff only and have the audience see things from the sheriff’s point of view this would have made the movie a MUCH stronger film (IMHO). I think having them arrive on the scene with the guy riding around oblivious on his lawn mower with his house on fire would have been a better way to go. What the audience makes up in their own mind would be vastly superior to what was shown. Instead, we got all the info before the sheriff got HIS phone call. I guess the director figured the audience already knows what’s going on before they even sit down in their theater seat and so he needs to give them some onscreen killin’… I guess.

I don’t get why after walking around the house threateningly with a knife, scaring his family, and then cooking them that the guy becomes catatonic again. Oh wait, yeah I do. Plot convenience. The film-makers had to put him in a jail cell so we could see the progression from normal looking space case to the full ‘cheap zombie-like’ makeup FX. And oooooh, the zombie makeup of the present! I have to tell you I miss the days when a Tom Savini skeletal looking zombie wanders onscreen or has the top of his head lopped off by helicopter blade… but that’s just me. Nowadays, we  just get bloodshot eyes, some fake looking wounds, some airbrushed squiggles to look ‘veiny’ and some black grease to make them look dirty… I guess I’m sounding a bit contradictory to my claims of NOT being a gorehound right now, aren’t I?… Back to the story…

Later, some hunters who are hanging out in the local bog stumble upon a parachute (complete with dead guy) and the sheriff is called in, along with one forensics guy (if I remember right) and it’s quickly determined that he’s been there a week. Soon the sheriff and deputy find the plane that belonged to the pilot and I’m happy to say that the screenwriters wrote the sheriff to be smart enough to figure out (very quickly) that what was leaking out of the plane into the town’s water supply was what was responsible to what’s happening in his town. He makes a quick trip (quick remember since this all happens in 2 days) to get a blueprint/map of the town’s water system to trace the flow of the contaminated water to the first victims’ houses. We then get the second ‘Jaws’ moment.

The Sheriff meets with the town’s mayor to relay his discovery. Of course, the mayor scoffs at the ‘theory’ and tells him that he won’t allow them shutting down the town’s water system just like the Mayor denying Brody in Jaws. Except in Jaws, a GREAT film as opposed to this one, the Mayor ‘s ‘money first’ personality had already been established in the movie before Brody asks him to shut down the beaches. And the reason the mayor gives was more valid since the beach tourist season was vital to that community and it is just one shark attack (or so they thought). In The Crazies, the only scene with the mayor is this disagreement and it makes no sense in the context of the movie or in reality. The sheriff is telling him that the water’s poisoned and he’s not going to do anything about it? This might’ve made sense later, had the next scene caused some more conflict between the 2 men.

The sheriff defies the order and  along with his deputy goes to shut down the water himself. He does and the deputy mentions he might not have a job later. The mayor’s scene would make sense if there had been a follow up scene where the Mayor was either arresting or firing the Sheriff  for insubordination. I guess my point is that the previous scene was just a time waster. It had no other reason to be in the movie. None. If you can tell me a reason why it was there, I’d like to hear it.

It’s around this point, give or take that the Sheriff walks down Ogden Marsh’s now very empty ‘main street’ (except for one crazy on a bike that rides by). It’s a ghost town at this point and I was wondering how that happened since it’s later revealed that it takes 48 hours for people to start showing symptoms of ‘the crazies’. Before this shot and after there are still plenty of normal people running around so the only reason why it’s there is just because it looks cool. Or because the director wanted to do a shot similar to the one in Danny Boyle’s 28 Days later where Cillian Murphy is wandering a London devoid of inhabitants. This didn’t have anywhere near the scope of that one.

And as Olyphant walks up the street, the audience is shown that there is someone taking pictures of him. This is never really explained why. It was just to (very woodenly) foreshadow the guv’ment types that were about to show up… David notices the black government SUV and after running over to it, the vehicle squeals off in Hollywood stunt driver fashion. Along the way the sheriff  and his deputy also get to witness the drastic changes in appearance and behavior of their prisoner. They also note things like their cell phones and telephones aren’t working.

I think this was about the time the sheriff hears a noise coming from inside a funeral home. Of course when he goes in, it’s dark and he doesn’t even bother to check for a light switch like a normal person. No matter, he finds the room where there are several bodies covered by sheets. One is the guy (I believe) killed the previous day by the sheriff, only the embalmer has cut large x’s over the eyes like a dead cartoon character. The sheriff then sees another sheet covered body moving. What he finds under the sheet is a very large man with his eyes and lips sewed up even though he’s still alive. I don’t know if he was strapped down or tied or something, because I don’t think they showed that.

He just laid there like a lump. The sheriff quickly uses some snippers to allow the man to speak. As soon as he does, the man says (and I remind you that the guy’s eyes are still sewn shut): “Behind you!”… Excuse me I have to slap myself in the forehead. ………………………………………………….Okay.  A minor skirmish between the sheriff and a very spindly little embalmer wielding an embalmer’s power saw ensues and you already know who wins. In the aftermath, Russell the Deputy pops up. Now, I’m not sure in the quick cut editing (pun intended), if the man on the slab was killed by the embalmer during the melee. Either way, the 2 lawmen don’t bother to check and just leave the poor guy with his eyes sewn shut laying on the slab.

Okay, later on that night (working from memory), the sheriff is home with the wife and they’re talking about the strange occurrences in the town, when she sees a man outside their window. The sheriff goes into his barn to investigate but finds nothing. When he exits the barn he is non-surprisingly subdued by not The Crazies, but what looks to be National Guardsmen in biohazard outfits.

The soldiers take Olyphant and Mitchell away to a camp outside of town where the entire township is being ‘processed’ in rather Nazi-like fashion.  No explanations are given to their questions, the ‘sick’ are merely being separated from the healthy. Judy is taken away, despite David’s  (and her own) protests. It’s also shown that kids are being taken from their mothers… people who resist get shot… Chaos! David isn’t in captivity all of 12 seconds, though, because fortunately some crazy extras (not crazy in the sense that they’re one of the Crazies, although I suppose they could have been), ram the perimeter fence with their pickup truck and open fire on the soldiers.

While the soldiers waste the extras, nearly the entire town of Ogden Marsh breaks out of captivity. This is also where one of the Sheriff’s friends says he should give up his ‘fool’s errand’ of trying to save his wife. Naturally, David calls the guy a lowlife, in so many words… So the community crumbles so quickly and cynically. For plot convenience. There might have been more weight to this exchange if they had at least shown this guy earlier portrayed as a fine upstanding citizen. Here it’s just randomly thrown in.

Meanwhile, Judy reveals she’s pregnant. That particular revelation has ZERO plot relevance; it just gives the audience an explanation as to why she was taken away with the sick. No matter, the guv’ment types aren’t listening and put her in a room with the infected who are all strapped to gurneys like Judy is. Judy’s assistant Becca is also here and is also (conveniently) not showing any signs of the virus, either.

Okay, I could be wrong on this part, but I swear when the sheriff goes back to his office to get his gun and the deputy is there… there’s daylight outside. They show another guv’ment SUV go flying by the sheriff’s office and I’m fairly positive, it’s in the daytime. So how many days has that been now? Anyway, its here where the sheriff determines his wife must be pregnant. That’s why they took her with the others he deduces when she’s NOT SICK. And his deputy turns up again, complaining that they popped his vehicle’s tires when he was trying to get to another city.

Okay, one of the twisted moments from the trailer occurs at this point. A crazy that is too lazy to pick up his pitchfork wanders in to the now abandoned (I guess) government/military operation and finds the room where Judy and  Becca are confined.

He begins killing the sick one by one with his pitchfork. The sick aren’t even aware they’re being killed, so it’s a lot less horrible to the audience.

When he gets to Becca (who is closer in line than Judy), Judy screams and the crazy turns his attention to her.

Just as he raises his pitchfork to run her through, I was thinking “this is where gun fire is heard from off screen, some squibs go off in the Crazy actor’s chest or head and the sheriff and the deputy run in just in the nick of time”. I won’t tell you if that happened or not.

The 4 leave, not even checking to see if anyone else on the gurnies are not infected . They begin looking for a car to make it to a truck stop outside of town, but not before running into the 3 hunters who had found the pilot’s body earlier on in the film. They’re crazies now and unlike the lazy-crazy with the pitchfork (who was killing other crazies), these 3 are working together. Instead of hunting animals out of season, they’re now shown to be hunting people out of season. There is no confrontation, because we know that will pop up later when the movie needs some crazies to pop up again, probably in the climax…. They quickly discover that every vehicle in town has had a ‘boot’ put on one tire to keep anyone from driving away…. So while rounding up everyone in town in just a few hours, the guv’ment has also managed to put a boot on every single vehicle in town. EVERY SINGLE VEHICLE (except for the Crazy Hunters’ truck, of course). That’s a helluvan’ operation. Would require an extreme amount of manpower and… time… OF COURSE). So here’s where the sheriff divulges he’s been working on getting an older cop car running. It runs, they just have to put the tires back on. So they head back on foot to the House of Dutton.

But, not before veering off course to go find Becca’s boyfriend. They find him, but not before he holds them at gunpoint. Even with his girlfriend there, he’s still over-reacting (and holding her at gunpoint, too). The sheriff quickly disarms him and that’s when the military types show up. The group stays hidden in a barn until the boyfriend’s mother is taken from her house to which point the boyfriend rushes in to defend her unarmed. Predictably they shoot him and the mother. For me, this is one more scene that shouldn’t be there. It’s repetitive. They’ve already shown that innocent civilians are being shot. This is more of the same. The boyfriend is killed, so why is this subplot even in the film other than to show some more pointless deaths? They’re just trying to get the running time up is all that I can figure. Ninety minutes used to be your average movie length and rightfully so. Most movie ideas can’t sustain a story longer than that. Back to the movie…

On another side note, don’t the National guardsmen have night sight goggles? Just a question that has nothing to do with anything really… But one soldier is captured by the Sheriff and co. when he investigates the barn. But after all we’ve seen of the completely cold tactics of the military/guv’ment operation, this turns out to be the ONLY good soldier in the bunch and says he won’t narc on them.  He also states that he is just following orders, although he has no idea who is giving them. Apparently he doesn’t have a CO…. They let him go and he doesn’t reveal their presence. So in the way that stories work, I fully expected this soldier to pop back up in the movie to repay the favor of them not killing him. USUALLY that’s how these stories work. They introduced this guy so that he’ll have a purpose later, right? Nope. Never seen again. Do I think all things presented in a story have to have a reason for being there? No. A lot of great comedies are just very flimsy plots tied together with things that are just funny. Gags. There are beautiful shots in movies that are there just for the sake of the visual. But what’s going on here, is that you have writers and a director who don’t know which parts to take out and which to leave in. As I said about the cinematography, they really don’t seem to know the purpose to the scenes in the main framework of the story that they’re setting to film.

Arriving back at the Duttons’ home  at dawn (time?), they immediately separate. Russell and Becca begin to put the cruiser’s tires back on in the shed and the Duttons go inside and split up so you know there are Crazies abounding. Judy goes upstairs and of course there are Crazies, this time the wife and son of the man who was killed by David on the baseball field (I guess that never happened in Jaws). But instead of doing what the Crazies have been doing, they tie Judy up and wait to ambush David. He comes looking for her and of course they attack… There’s a gunshot or 2 before David gets stabbed in the hand. He in turn stabs the mother, with the knife still THROUGH his hand, which seems like it wouldn’t work to me, but anyhow… The son meanwhile has gotten David’s gun and raises it to shoot when…. Gunfire heard, an FX squib goes off in the Crazy’s chest and the Deputy is shown lowering his rifle having saved the day, just in the nick….

The group climbs into their car and gets back out on the road. At this point, the director decided it might be cool to show that some of the group may be infected also. So despite thinking the deputy is becoming a crazy, they ignore it and soldier on. Soon after they begin their journey out of town, they are attacked by military helicopter.

They take refuge in a car wash which I was waiting for crazies to jump out since they show the car wash moments in the trailer. The car wash comes on and predictably the car won’t start.

So they go through the wash, battling the Crazies that are running it. This is where Becca adds to the kill total, being dispatched in a rather silly way.

The zombie types in this movie go from using fairly primitive means of murder to more ingenious and imaginative methods. as the one does with Becca, making a lariat/noose from one of the wash hoses and using it to lasso her from the car and to kill her.

Then they pull the car out of the car wash and everyone gets out to help Becca who was obviously dead since it was ‘her time’ in the film to be the victim. While trying to get her body down, the helicopter, which had disappeared for a while, destroys the car and flies away. So the remaining 3 are on foot, again.

I guess they decided ‘okay, time for the explanation that the audience already knows’.  Just as they happen upon the deputy’s vehicle (who complained earlier about them popping his tires), a trademark guv’ment black SUV comes speeding their way. The sheriff’s idea is to commandeer the vehicle, but the deputy who is acting Crazy uses one of those roll out Cop strips that pop vehicles’ tires (avenging what the guv’ment did to him). There is a pretty spectacular car crash and one unnamed guv’ment type survives in order to provide some irrelevant answers. He tells them the plane crash had a bioweapon aboard that was being flown to Texas for disposal, when it crashed and they were there to contain the pandemic.

Then, Russell shoots the guy and  they begin their journey again on foot with the Duttons being held at gunpoint. Eventually the sheriff gets the gun away from Russell and he asks if they would let him walk along with them a little farther, so that he could redeem himself in a last act of self sacrifice to ensure that the Duttons could make it out of town alive. Okay, he didn’t say that last half, but I swear I was hearing him say that in my mind.

So the deputy remains with them for plot convenience  and causes a diversion when they come to a military roadblock. The Duttons sneak by (in the dark.. time?) and manage to make it to a truck stop that they had talked about, but find deserted. Naturally, the sheriff tells his pregnant wife to wait alone in the dark while he looks around inside.  She in turn wanders off again, IN THE DARK, and finds that there are trailers (the kind they haul cattle in) full of dead people and bullet casings all over the ground. Darn guv’ment. The sheriff finds her at this point and they go inside where…

David once again leaves his pregnant wife ALONE, while he goes to find a vehicle. What purpose does it serve other than for, again, plot convenience?

Unsurprisingly, the 3 redneck hunter types are here hunting humans. I can’t tell you how they got by the roadblock since I would have to imagine they would be hooting and hollering down the road like they were when we last saw them. I guess they got vewwy vewwy quiet when they needed to be.

One last battle  is staged and in the middle of it, David comes across a military radio where we overhear them preparing for a countdown.  We all know what countdowns in movies mean. Especially, ‘incureable virus unleashed in a small town’ movies

So after dispatching the last hick hunter, the Duttons climb aboard a diesel truck and hit the road…. I love 18 wheelers. They’re a plus in just about any good action movie (The Terminator, T2, The Road Warrior, Breakdown, Joy Ride, Duel… I could go on). Oh, back to the movie.

They speed down the highway listening to the countdown, before a nuke is dropped on Ogden Marsh.

Yes, a nuke, which is usually the option in bad (and usually low budget) B-Pandemic/Zombie flicks. I guess the guv’ment wasn’t worried about those poor guys setting roadblocks. The Duttons survive, although I wouldn’t be sure of how long since they must have gotten a large dose of radiation.

The film ends, mercifully, with them heading across a field into a city in Iowa (I’m assuming the location), but not before satellite imaging shows that the guv’ment is aware of their survival and containment/quarantine procedures are beginning in this new location. Then we get some Willie Nelson (which reminds me). At the beginning of the film, we get some Johnny Cash, which isn’t a problem of itself, but it IS getting a bit cliche in these types of films, considering it immediately made me think of the beginning of the Dawn Of The Dead remake. The soundtrack for this one should’ve featured every song with the word Crazy in the title, but that’s just me.

Well, that’s about all I have to say about this movie…. 2.5 out of 5. Would have been lower, but the visuals were good, there was a minimum of obvious CGI FX and I like the actors for the most part.  I do think it was a very generic movie, though, that could have benefitted A LOT from a little more ‘real world’ logical thought. Not the worst movie I’ve ever seen by a long shot, but aggravating in its lack of logic, none the less.

Again, she doesn't look like this in the movie...

Wonderful Life

Posted in A Few Old, Short Words, Music with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 26, 2010 by Crash! Landen
“Life didn’t promise to be wonderful.”

-Teddy Pendergrass (March 26, 1950 – January 13, 2010)

If you don’t know me by now, you won’t know that I like movies…. Saw one earlier. The Crazies which I’ll review later. I also saw some trailers. A new ‘Nightmare On Elm Street’ trailer, which I think they’re already showing too much. Hopefully it’s not a letdown. A ‘Nightmare’ remake doesn’t need a whole lot of ‘sellin’ to bring in horror fans and usually when they are doing the excessive amounts of advertising, they do that because they’ve seen the movie and know they need to make as much money as they can on that first weekend. Again, hopefully that won’t be the case. I also saw the new KickAss trailer. I know some of the guys over at Rob Liefeld’s site were looking forward to it, but to me it’s looking more and more like a loser movie. The fact that you have what looks like an 8 year old girl ‘kicking ass’  and having it get an ‘R’ rating sounds like they have no idea what they’re doing. Maybe I’ll be proven wrong.

I’ve been sick for a few days (since Tuesday), but I think I finally may be feeling a little better. It’s funny that you can be sick for just a day or 2 and feel like you’re never going to be well again. I think this is the first time I’ve been sick in 3 years or more (other than a migraine or 2), so I guess I should count my blessings… Ahem… 1, 2, 3,4 ,5 ,6, 7… While I do that, here’s my favorite Pendergrass song who just passed away last month (along with a glimpse of Soul Train’s Don Cornelius).

Phantom Planet

Posted in Crash! Art with tags , , , , , , on February 23, 2010 by Crash! Landen

Here’s another ‘cheapie’ commission I did; this one being DC comics heroine Phantom Lady. The commission-er didn’t request color. Hopefully he’ll like her. I spent about 5-6 minutes grey toning it, just for myself.

I generally do full body shots on the cheap commission stuff. This one, I just zoomed in a little.

Another day, another logo (Graphite Jones’ Asgard)

Posted in Crash! Art with tags , , , , , , , , , on February 22, 2010 by Crash! Landen

Just wanted to post the latest logo I’ve done.  I’ve literally done thousands of logos in my years as a so-called ‘graphic artist’, but I think I’ve only done 4 or 5 comic book logos. This is the 2nd I’ve done in the last few months. I designed one for an Arcana Comics title called ‘Squirt’ a few months back, which is how I ‘got’ this one.

I did this one on the cheap for Graphite Jones, an artist who is self-publishing. As far as I know he’s doing everything himself as far as writing, drawing and inking. He has another artist coloring the covers for him (from what I just read). The book is called Asgard (obviously). As for the story content, Jones said “the book is a call back to the 90′s style comics with lots of action”.

This was the 3rd or 4th version I did of the logo (and I gave him several variations). I think he was happy with the final design.

Here’s the logo on darks…

He’s shooting for a summer release (again, as far as I know). Please look out for it.

Egon of the Real Ghostbusters

Posted in A Few Old, Short Words, Crash! Art with tags , , , , , , , , on February 21, 2010 by Crash! Landen

Got a commission request last week for Egon of the Real Ghostbusters Saturday Morning cartoon…

I threw in the box and the ghost critter for free. I would’ve thrown in ‘Slimer’ from the cartoon, except that I absolutely hated ‘Slimer’. Anyway, here’s the color version…

I kind of got carried away drawing him. I sometimes do that when I’m drawing while watching movies. I tried to combine my own style with the cartoon style. I think the commission-er was happy with the drawing (which is probably in Canada about now)…

Shutter Island Review (3.5 of 5) With Some Rambling

Posted in Reviews with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 20, 2010 by Crash! Landen

Martin Scorsese’s Shutter Island is probably the best movie I’ve seen this year while being the biggest disappointment. This is the least of the 4 movies that Scorsese has teamed with lead actor DiCaprio.

DiCaprio and Scorsese (with Michelle Williams in center)

Other than the movie’s trailer, I knew nothing about the story, but very early on (like the first 15 minutes) found myself quite aware  of where the movie was going and how it would end. It felt like I was strapped to the bow of the ferry in the  movie slowly drifting towards the Martin Scorsese film ‘Shutter Island’, but realizing that I was instead  caught in the sometimes turbulent rip-current of an M. Night Shyamalan movie.

A surprisingly revealing Shutter Island poster.‘The Village’ comes to mind , where I forecast the film’s story from the teaser movie poster. I was quietly pleading that the ferry’s captain (Scorsese) would right the vessel’s course and head into a direction that I did not see coming, but alas… nope.

But, it may just be me*.

*BEGINNING OF SIDE NOTE: I think it may be necessary to give just a slight bit of information of myself as a movie fan. I watch a lot of movies. I recently created my Best  and Worst Movie Lists of the Last 10 years. In the 2000s I made about  1000 trips to the movie theater. I’d say most people would think that’s a ridiculous amount of trips to the movie theater. They’re probably right, but I love movies and I won’t even try to figure out the number of movies rentals… I also do not limit myself to specific genres or mainstream films.I seek quality movies, no matter what the genre…. My last trip to Blockbuster I rented 4 (500 Days Of Summer, Martyrs, Franklyn and City Of God… I batted ‘.500′ on those 4, I guess). And I won’t even mention my addiction to channels like TCM… My point: I see a lot of movies. It may just be me.

MIDDLE OF SIDE NOTE: Generally, there are certain ways that movies (or stories for that matter) work, if they’re done ‘right’. There is a language of storytelling tricks/devices/elements that are used by anyone that makes films (or stories). Story structure. Red Herrings. MacGuffins. Flashbacks. Foreshadowing. You can start at the beginning of a story. You can start at the end of a story. You can work backwards, forwards or jump around. This movie does all of that (yes, it starts at the beginning and the end, sort of). You can tell stories straightforward or do something like Rashomon, where you get several retellings of the same view. You kind of get that here (in a way), along with the audience finding out information as the main character does, which is typical of suspense thrillers. Being someone who wants to tell stories, I study story in all of its different forms. I read novels, comic books (which in terms of storytelling can be like static films in the right creators’ hands), and films themselves. When you’ve seen it enough, you begin to recognize it when, again, it’s done ‘right’. My point: I see a lot of movies. It may just be me.

SEMI-END OF SIDE NOTE: Movies also make use of symbolism and character actions may take on deeper meaning than just the literal act represented. Shutter Island makes use of many symbols and motifs  that have been used since right from the beginning of cinema.

Right from the start of the film, Scorsese makes use of the deeper meanings of a ship coming out of a thick fog. He ties in the lead character’s symbolic ties to water. He portrays an impending storm. He later uses several symbols depicting illumination from a simple match, to shadowy  prison cells, to a lighthouse.

And in a movie about insanity, he uses one of the tried and true symbols of madness: the portrayal of a character moving up or down a spiral staircase. Hitchcock used that one a lot, which figures since Scorsese gave the movie’s cast a screening of Vertigo ( I read that, anyway), to give them an indication of the tone that he was shooting for. Sometimes directors try to make use of symbols and fail. They hint at some deeper meaning, but without making it obvious to what the symbols mean, then the symbolism is lost and there is no meaning. But Scorsese is a director who knows what he’s doing and what he is doing is instantly recognizable and for me, gives away where he is going with the story. My point: I see a lot of movies. It may just be me.

END OF SIDE NOTE

If you haven’t seen as many films I have, you may not see the ending coming (but you still might). Regardless of knowing where it’s going, it’s still a very well made film (and pays a lot of homage to the film noir B movies of yesteryear). The quality of the film is topnotch from it’s director to the cast to the production crew.  I loved the look of this movie. The film has a style more reminiscent of another crime noir homage made by the director: Cape Fear. It’s dark and gritty and  looks like the throwback that is , albeit with harder edges.

Interesting footnote: This character had a visible neck scar 'erased' from the trailer.

Scorsese has always been kind of a minimalist straightforward storyteller, but you can always tell that it’s one of his films. He has for the most part concentrated on stories that are very much grounded in reality and has rarely ventured into the fantastic. I don’t think he’s very comfortable doing that, and for me, it showed in Shutter Island.

There were  a few dream sequences scattered throughout, that didn’t seem very inspired, although probably not without reason (I assume he was trying to blur the line between reality and insanity). But that’s just a minor nitpick.

The premise of Shutter Island is that 2 Federal Marshals have been brought in to investigate the escape of one of the insane asylum’s 66 violent inmates/patients.

The insane asylum  is on an island with only one point of entry since the island’s terra firma sits atop a base of sheer cliff walls.

One of the Marshals is Teddy Daniels (played by Leonardo DiCaprio), who is a bit hydrophobic for some reason and seems to know there is something going on below the surface of the main investigation.

He soon discovers that there may be a 67th patient that the hospital’s staff appears to want to cover up. Saying anymore would probably give too much away, although if you’re like me….

The movie has a great cast beginning with DiCaprio, who I think really is a solid actor.  Of the 4 movies that he has teamed with Scorsese, this one required him to show a lot more ‘extreme’ emotional states. I think he was actually better than the script material.

I feel like I need to run down the entire cast to convey what a great job they did, along with DiCaprio. Ben Kingsley and Max Von Sydow are not stranger’s to the villain roles and both are both typically good at looking bad. Kingsley adds a lot of nuance to any character he plays and in roles like this, you can’t be sure what his intentions are.

Von Sydow on the other hand, doesn’t have to act a whole lot to play a ‘scary german guy’.

Mark Ruffalo, who is himself a fine actor, seems a little out of place in the film. Not him as much as his character. He’s once again kind of a nice guy, which he plays well, but everyone else in the film falls into the intense, sinister or outright crazy categories.

Ruffalo brought along a few of his ‘Zodiac’ co-stars whom I enjoyed seeing: John Carroll-Lynch and Elias Koteas. Koteas is barely recognizable here. Both of them don’t have a whole lot to do, other than to briefly act sinister (there’s that word again).

Former child star Jackie Earle Haley continues his career comeback. I’m very happy to see that continue being a fan of his early movies like Breaking Away and the Bad News Bears.Also enjoyed seeing Patricia Clarkson who makes a cameo as… well can’t give it away I guess…

But there was a lot of ‘acting talent’ in smaller roles. Ted Levine, Emily Mortimer, even Michelle Williams who despite being in a pivotal role in the film doesn’t really get to develop a character to any length.

The look of the film is excellent. It’s dark and the sets are very dark and textured. Surprisingly, though, for a film set in an insane asylum it wasn’t very creepy. This movie lacked a lot of the actiual tension from The Departed or Gangs of New York. I also found the soundtrack a little distracting.

The movie begins with ocean view shots of the island, itself and the music underscores the dread and foreboding along with the grey sky, but I thought it started to resemble parody when every single small moment was escorted by booming brass instruments. Shots of the dock: deep blaring horns.

The under-utilized John Carroll-Lynch...

Shots of the guards: deep blaring horns. Getting into the jeep: deep blaring horns. Seeing the gates to the insane asylum: deep blaring horns.

Big horns go here...

Opening the gates: deep blaring horns. You get the idea. I thought it was overdone.

This is also another case where I thought there was too much left in the film, also. Like I just mentioned, Scorsese spent a large amount of time just showing DiCaprio and Ruffalo getting from the ferry to the asylum. You can chalk that up to setting up mood, but I felt like it was overkill. The movie’s ending also suffers from this. When the big ‘reveal’ comes, it is lingered upon for an extended period of time. After being filled in extensively of what actually happened earlier in the story, Scorsese feels the need to showing it in snore-fest fashion. When the movie is supposed to be hitting a climax, it slows to an absolutely tedious crawl. After that, we get another epilogue-like ending.

There were also several other scenes that I thought were well done, but completely unnecessary. Where Scorsese usually is ‘riffing’ here he seemed to be just meandering and navel gazing. As I mentioned before there are a lot of great actors in the film. I wonder if that hurt the overall film. Instead of ‘telling the story’, the movie would kind of come to a stop so that yet another actor could show off their ability.

I think some extensive editing could have made a ‘tighter’ film. I think it would have fit the story better. The 2 hour and 18 minutes seemed a little long for the story. The story material was not that of an epic. By the end of this I had melted into the theater chair. When I got up after the credits it felt like I had been a passenger in a 4 hour car ride.

By no means do I think that this was a bad film. I’m giving it 3.5 of 5 whatevers. I think the fact that I knew how it was going to end took some of my enthusiasm for it away. I also thought the whole ‘role-playing’ explanation was pretty weak . If you see the movie, you’ll know what I’m talking about when it finally pops up. But, again, it may just be me. You may think it’s the best movie of the year (but so far, so do I).

Percy Jackson And The Olympians: The Lightning Thief Review (2.5 of 5)

Posted in Reviews with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 18, 2010 by Crash! Landen

Obviously this will be compared to the Harry Potter franchise and after seeing it, I would agree with the comparisons to some extent. Same kind of title. What starts out as a ‘camp’ for special (magical) kids, becomes a school by the end of it.

Percy (played by Logan Lerman) doesn’t have a great home life  (Percy has an absentee dad and he and his mother lives with a sleasebag). He also feels average only to be informed that really he’s a special magical kid with superpowers and is taken off to a summer camp for demigods. The main difference with Percy and Harry is that this is like an American version compared to Harry Potter being set in England.

One thing I did like: whereas Potter liberally borrows and steals from  other movies, stories and a myriad of diverse mythologies; Jackson concentrates on just Greek mythology. Instead of wizards, these kids are the offspring of Greek gods and humans. Instead of a school, it’s a camp. Instead of swinging dinky wands around, Percy Jackson cuts loose hacking away with a sword.

Jackson does have some differences from the Harry Potter series, aside from actually having an actual story with at least a semblance of conflict (am I prejudiced against the Potter series? Yes… I only really liked the 3rd one). Instead of a friend who’s scared of women, Jackson has a friend who turns out to be a very horny satyr (half human/half goat).

Instead of a strictly platonic relationship with his very girlish female best friend, Jackson has a curvy  female friend to whom he wants to ‘hook up’ with. There is definitely a higher degree of boobage in Percy Jackson than in the Harry Potter movies, but again, this is the American counterpart.

Real thespians...

I think Rosario Dawson was only in the film to show off her thespians, which seems a little… I don’t know, this is a tweener kids’ movie isn’t it? It also had a higher level of violence than the Potter movies, but took the violence a LOT less seriously.

Percy Jackson actually had a bit of humor in it, which helped it from becoming a snoozefest. Some of the humor was a bit stilted, but there were more than a few attempts at evoking chuckles. I laughed more in this than I did in all 19 of the Potter movies (ok, it just feels like 19 Potter films. Seen them all and can’t remember much more about them than they mostly sucked real bad). Also unlike Potter, Jackson’s adventures mainly happen in real world locales like Las Vegas, New York, etc… The tone in general was a bit more realistic, despite still being a ‘young readers’ adventure series. I applaud that, BUT… I do kind of think that the level of violence in this sort of movie was a bit misplaced. Whereas the Potter franchise is bloodless, the kids in the Percy Jackson film take up swords in training sessions and hack away at one another. Luckily some of them have special healing powers…whatever. I do question why adults would have kids training with actual weapons, but… whatever.

One thing I was extremely disappointed with, was that they ripped off Clash Of the Titans so shamelessly, especially with the Titans remake about to be released… It aggravates me… I won’t give it away for anyone who hasn’t seen the Harryhausen classic, but the scenes involving Medusa in this film are virtually interchangeable to those in ‘Clash’…

U-maaa... O-prah... O-prah... U-maaaa...

I did enjoy the scenes with Uma Thurman as Medusa, though. It seemed she reverted back to Poison Ivy mode (from the infamous Batman & Robin movie) and really hammed it up, but I didn’t mind it in this movie.

The movie’s story is very direct and predictable to a large degree. I knew who the Lightning Thief was immediately upon this person making his/her entrance. I’m sure you will also. But the actors were friendly enough…

There is a nice little epilogue after the movie ends and the credits roll. They also were nice enough not to put it at the end of the credits, too. Sometimes the little easter eggs that are left for patient viewers aren’t really worth the time, but I liked this one. It’s one of the better I’ve seen, really.

The CGI FX were pretty good. and were done with a little more care than movies like GI:Joe or The Mummy. The monsters/creatures in this movie were fun.

Hades was cooler than this in the film, I swear...

I especially liked the look of Hades, until he reverted back to his more human looking form and he turned out to be Steve Coogan. There are also minotaurs and Hydras and other greek mythological beasties. This whole movie is like a beginner’s guide to Greek Mythology, but it had just enough to stay likeable.

The FX and the humor kept it mildly entertaining and I will admit there was maybe one surprise or 2. If there are future installments, hopefully they will be a little better than this one. That being said, I think this was a better ‘entertainment’ than the first 2 Potter films (which is surprising since Chris Columbus directed all 3). It was a little less ‘nerd-cringeworthy’ also. I’ll give it 2.5 out of 5 whatevers, but it’s a high 2.5.

Best Superhero Movies of the Decade (2000s)

Posted in Lists with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 16, 2010 by Crash! Landen
10 X2: X-Men United
9 Iron Man
8 Watchmen
7 TMNT
6 The Incredibles
5 Hellboy II
4 Spider-Man 2
3 Hulk
2 Batman Begins
1 The Dark Knight
Thoughts? Good list? Bad list? Did I leave one out?

The Wolfman Review (2 of 5)

Posted in Reviews with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 15, 2010 by Crash! Landen

I read that Director Mark Romanek quit ‘The Wolfman’ citing the fact that he couldn’t make a movie on a reportedly $85-100 million dollar budget… Let me say that again: Director Mark Romanek quit ‘The Wolfman’ citing the fact that he couldn’t make a movie on a reportedly $85-100 million dollar budget. I have no response to that really…. What? You can’t make a movie with just ONE monster in it on a budget of $85-100 million dollars….. $85-100 million dollars. What? I’m sorry. I’m just having a hard time grasping that…. I’ll go as far to throw this out there: If anybody out there wants to pony up 10 -$20,000, I promise you I’ll make a better film than this one. This moronic primadonna had 100 MILLION dollars American to work with and this is what he came up with… And think that was one of the many behind the scenes problems that were reported over the course of a couple of years that signaled that this was NOT going to be a werewolf movie, but a real dog.

The review. The review…. Okay: the story… Awful. They didn’t spend any of that budget on a story…. Lacks horror. Lacks humor. Lacks suspense. Lacks emotion. Lacks a  worthwhile story to tell.

There was  a half-assed attempt to hint at a gothic love story, which was just that: half-assed. They just couldn’t seem to figure out  what to do with a story about a wolfman. They borrowed a good bit from the original, from the ‘Talbot’ name, the gypsy, the rhyme at the beginning and end of the film, the wolf head cane, etc; but they didn’t work any of those elements into the context of a workable story.

Not from the new Wolfman movie...

The FX were a combo of  old school makeup FX and CGI. The biggest flaw in the film was adhering to a large degree to the look of the old films.  I love old horror movies. I love just about anything with Lon Chaney, Lon Jr., Boris Karloff, etc. Love movies like London After Midnight, Nosferatu, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari and of course The Wolfman. The FX in those movies are top notch for the period of time in which they were made. But the Lon Chaney Jr version of the Wolfman was a guy running around with some furry appliances on his face and hands and some fake teeth…

Nowadays that just doesn’t cut the mustard… At least not on 100 million dollar budgeted movies… Really, the end result of the monster’s design resembled a man sized stuffed animal. Something about the big puppy dog nose that they tried to retain from Lon Chaney Jr’s Wolfman, just looked like something you’d see on a well made kids’ TV movie (maybe on Nickelodean or Diusney channel).

Not from the new Wolfman movie...

What’s really strange to me, is that the ‘homage paid’ to the werewolf design seemed to have a closer resemblance to Oliver Reed’s  werewolf in The Curse Of the Werewolf.

On the plus side ( and there was a lot that this movie had going for it): A pretty good cast for a mainstream update of one of the ‘big 3′ Universal Studios monster flicks… Anthony Hopkins, Benicio Del Toro,Hugo Weaving (and Emily Blunt, I guess)…. These aren’t B Movie actors.

I generally haven’t been a fan of Del Toro’s movies, but I think he’s a decent actor. He’s believable, but this story wasn’t. he could’ve asked for a better wig to wear, as well.

I have yet to see Emily Blunt in a GOOD film. I’m sure she can act, just given the parts in major movies that she keeps landing. In The Wolfman she is mainly given the task of looking forlorn and giving long melancholy gazes without speaking. If anyone plays a drinking game with this one where the time you take a drink is when Blunt cries, is on the verge of tears or her lip quivers, they  will get smashed fairly early on in the movie. Apparently Blunt was hired for this film role because of her mastery of the lip quiver.

Hugo Weaving genuinely appeared to be trying to do his best. Most of the time he was standing surrounded by ‘townsfolk’ and speaking orders that were meaningless to the plot or what was happening onscreen. ” You! Go that way! You! Check downtown! We may be looking for a killer downtown somewhere! You! Call my agent! Tell him he’s fired! This movie is a dog! I was in the Matrix and the Lord of The Rings Trilogy! What the hell am I doing in this overbudgeted suckfest of a film? “…. That wasn’t actual dialogue in the film.

Hopkins on the other hand is beginning to resemble Sam Jackson in his lack of shame. Just send him a big wad of cash and he’ll be in anything. You will get top notch Hopkins acting, though. I could swear Sam Jackson kept turning to the camera and winking at me when I watched ‘The Spirit’, chuckling  ” and you paid to watch this crap! Ha ha! Gotcherwallet!” I swear he said that. Anyway… Hopkins was Hopkins making really awful dialogue sound pretty good within the confines of worthless schlock.

The sets were impressive. You can see a lot of the movie’s budget in the sets… The CGI generated sky/ overcast backgrounds were not nearly as impressive as the real shots of gothic mansions and locations.

The costumes were rather well done, although it seemed that the clothes that these actors were wearing were just that: costumes… They looked like they were getting ready for a photo shoot in Vanity Fair instead of actually making a movie.

I’ve never been a gorehound for the sake of gore… I like good movies. If they have gore in them, I don’t care as long as the movie’s good (John Carpenter’s The Thing is a great example…. GREAT FILM!). There was a good bit of CGI gore, but in this case, it wasn’t interesting since they were only trying to distract you, the viewer, from the crap story. And most of it wasn’t done that well, anyway. I laughed out loud at several inappropriate moments, but that falls on the director, not me.Make a good film and I’ll emote at the appropriate times.

One big thing that you usually get in a good werewolf movie: the transformation. This one was decent, but still pales in comparison to those in American Werewolf In London and The Howling.

And that’s all I care to say about this one. I give it a very disappointed (and bored) 1.5 out of 5 whatevers…. Yep. That’s all I have to say.

Crash! Landen’s Best 100 Movies of the Decade (2000s/2000-2009)

Posted in A Few Old, Short Words, Lists with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 14, 2010 by Crash! Landen
When I first posted this list I wanted to keep it simple. There aren’t any explanations for their worthiness of  being on the list other than a few have links to my reviews of the movies. I’m updating as I go and at some point all of these will have their proper review links. You can see by the number of ‘bumped’ movies (17 and counting) that I have already had a number of revisions, including leaving one of the Lord of the Rings movies off and not being able to count to 100 properly. I think that’s corrected now.
This is a List that covers the decade of the 2000s, so don’t expect any films from 2010 and beyond to be on this list. This is NOT a list of my personal favorites. It’s a list of the films that I think were the most well-made and that can cover a lot of things. I took into account what the film was aiming to do, the story, characterization, production values, aesthetics, importance, where the film originated from, entertainment value, subtext, originality and even the audience it was intended for among other things. There are films on the list that I definitely was not for whom the film was intended for, but I still recognize its success with it’s intended audience. It still has to be a good movie, though. I think I could properly and to some degree objectively defend every film on the list. The placement isn’t imprortant to me so much, whether a film at #22  might be better than a film at 16. I just tried to make a list with 100 (+) films that were worth seeing. Everyone has different tastes, so you might not enjoy one of these as much as I did, but I’m sure there are films here that would surprise even if you weren’t a fan of the particular genre that the story takes place in. I personally would have never thought that I would have liked a ‘chick flick/kids’ movie like ‘Enchanted’ or one like’The Band’s Visit’ a slow moving foreign film about an Egyptian orchestra gets stranded overnight in a small Isreali town without any large fireworks. Okay, maybe ‘The Band’s Visit’. Subtitles don’t scare me.

I guess that’s enough of an explanation and if you want more… Here’s my  Top 100 of the 1990s.

And now I’ve also  completed my Top 100 of the 1980s.

The next few films (15 or so) have been ‘bumped’, but were in my Top 100 at one time.  I’m leaving the posters up for the ones that got knocked out, though. TMNT was once #100 and is still a great film. Hands down, the best computer generated martial arts flick ever. There are still revisions to be made, though, having seen some other REALLY good films of this era that deserve to be here. This isn’t a list of cement. It’s in a constant state of flux as all of my lists are.

 The Majestic TMNT
The Lookout
Lord of War
The Proposition
The Girl In The Cafe
A Knight’s Tale
The Darjeeling Limited
War of the Worlds
 The Weather Man
 Walk the Line
 The Incredibles
 Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
 Moon

Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World

(Bumped) Michael Clayton
(Bumped) The Fall

And Now the Top 100.

100 Ghost Town
99 Beautiful Creatures
98 Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
97 O Brother, Where Art Thou?
96 Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit
95 Zatoichi (The Blind Swordsman)
94 Kabluey!
93 Enchanted
92 Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
91 Serenity
90 Hellboy II
89 Eastern Promises
87 3:10 to Yuma
86 Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest
85 Ghost World
84 The Last King of Scotland
83 The Fountain
82 Babel

81 Sunshine

80 The Bourne Ultimatum
79 The Prestige
78 Stranger Than Fiction
77 Apocalypto
76 The Kite Runner
75 American Splendor
74 The Passion of the Christ
73 Kill Bill Vol. 2
72 Melinda and Melinda
71 Garden State
70 Seabiscuit
69 Spider-Man 2
68 Kill Bill Vol. 1
67 Intermission
66 House of Sand and Fog
65 Grizzly Man
64 King Kong
62 Match Point
61 Finding Nemo
60 Wall-E
59 Crazy Heart
58 Enemy at the Gates
57  A Prophet
56 Amélie
53 The Wrestler
52 Body of Lies
51 Croupier
50 The Royal Tenenbaums
49 Monsters, Inc.
48 Kung Fu Panda
47 In Bruges
46 The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
45 Gone Baby Gone
44 Ratatouille
43 Unbreakable
42 Up
41 Closer
40 The Aviator
39 Chicken Run
38 Hulk
37 The Bourne Identity
36 The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
35 The Ring
34 In America
33 Sideways
32 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
31 Requiem for a Dream
30  Gangs of New York
29 Cinderella Man
28 Gladiator
27 City Of God
26 Slumdog Millionaire
25 The Constant Gardener
24 Blood Diamond
23 Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
22 Casino Royale
21 Kingdom of Heaven
20 Black Hawk Down
19 The Return (Russian flick)
17 Hot Fuzz
16 The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship OfThe ring
15 The Departed
14 Batman Begins
13 Munich
12 Twilight Samurai
11 The Diving Bell And The Butterfly
10 Man On Wire
9 The Band’s Visit
8 The Dark Knight
7 No Country For Old Men
6 Zodiac
5 Pan’s Labyrinth
4 Gosford Park
3 Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
2 Children of Men
1 Adaptation

Thoughts?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers